skip to main content

Corporate / Industrial

Artı2000

Brand modernization meets performance marketing.

At a glance

Sector

Corporate / Industrial

Engagement

6 months

Services

  • Brand Architecture
  • UX/UI Design
  • Performance Marketing
  • Media Planning & Buying

MEASURED OUTCOMES

Impact

  • +62%

    organic traffic

  • +48%

    qualified quote requests

  • -31%

    media-buying CPA

  • 92%

    brand consistency score

  • -24%

    first-response to quote time

  • 87%

    sales-marketing shared taxonomy adoption

01

The challenge

The brand identity and digital assets were outdated; communication and marketing efforts were fragmented.

02

What we did

We redesigned the corporate identity, modernized digital assets, and built end-to-end performance marketing and media planning & buying systems.

Act one — The industry’s quiet pressure

By late 2024, Turkish industrial B2B manufacturers were waking up to an uncomfortable truth: buyers were now making 70% of their decision before ever speaking to a sales rep. McKinsey’s number became a silent alarm for teams who’d built their business on relationship-led selling. Most exporters to European markets were class-leading on product quality, but the first touch was no longer a trade show — it was a Google search and a LinkedIn reference.

Artı2000 was a player in that picture. For more than a decade, the company had built a reputation in industrial equipment manufacturing, expanding from Turkey into the Balkans and the Middle East. Their standing at sector trade shows was unquestioned. The engineering bench carried three generations of accumulated know-how. The product catalogue placed them at the top of competitive comparisons.

But the digital footprint told a different story. The website was a 2014 WordPress build that had grown through patchwork additions from a rotation of agencies. Typography decisions were a collision of three font families. The corporate color palette had drifted across export trade show seasons because of Pantone mismatches. The PowerPoint template the sales team relied on was a 2018 version that didn’t share visual DNA with the website. Catalogue PDFs were produced by yet another designer — the logo clarity on the cover was different again.

Performance marketing was even more fragile. About 18,000 EUR a month in Google Ads spend was being managed manually from a product code list maintained by the engineering department. Half of the category search volume was flowing to competitors via long-tail keywords, and Artı2000’s conversion rate sat below industry average. There was no Looker Studio. Reports were filled out in Excel by hand and reached the sales team three weeks later. No attribution. No definition of a qualified lead. No channel-level efficiency.

When the marketing director presented quarterly numbers to the board, “we’re growing” was the headline — but they couldn’t tell which euro had returned what. That tension is something a ten-year-old brand can carry for a while. By 2025’s buyer behavior, it couldn’t anymore.

The export team’s manager was hitting the same wall from a different angle. In a meeting with a new Balkan distributor, the technical team across the table had opened Artı2000’s website the day before, given up halfway, and walked into the meeting with a competitor’s brochure in hand. “We couldn’t find what we were looking for on your site.” The product was there. The page was there. It wasn’t findable. It was the cleanest example of how a decade of trade-show authority quietly evaporated in the digital channel.

Act two — This one has to be different

In January 2025, the marketing director walked into the board meeting with a single slide: a screenshot of a competitor’s LinkedIn company page. Consistent palette, professional motion graphics, weekly case study posts. Then their own LinkedIn page — last post was four months old, cover image clashed with the logo.

The decision was clear: this one has to be different. Three previous agency attempts had each ended halfway, for different reasons — one didn’t understand the brief, one kept rotating its team, one had delivered something “modern” that lost the engineering voice. The board was firm: one partner, end-to-end, owning brand and digital assets and performance marketing in a single thread. They didn’t want to go back to fragmented work.

The first contact with beynart came through a mutual connection. The brief was clean and honest: “Our product is good. Our communication isn’t. Anyone who knows us respects us; anyone who doesn’t, can’t find us. We’re looking for one partner who can fix that — and we want to see, in numbers, where we’re spending the budget.”

In the first discovery session, one more sentence anchored everything: “We don’t want to look modern. We want to look respected. The way a ten-year-old brand should.” That line set the design compass for the next six months.

On our side, the engagement scope was clear: this wouldn’t run as a single-channel project. Brand architecture, digital assets, and performance marketing would be carried end-to-end. Three discipline leads — brand, design, performance — set up a weekly review cycle in a shared Notion workspace. On the client side, a single decision-maker was named: the marketing director. The previous agency attempts had often collapsed under multi-headed approval chains. This one wouldn’t.

Act three — Inside view of six months

The engagement began in February 2025. The first three weeks went to the field: a factory floor walk-through, one-on-one conversations with engineers across three generations, Zoom recordings of the export manager’s calls with Balkan customers, transcripts of the last 50 sales-team quote conversations. The output of that discovery phase wasn’t a deck — it was a 47-page “brand reality” document: how customers described Artı2000 in their own words, how competitors positioned themselves, the product’s actual differentiator, the shared terms that surfaced repeatedly in sales conversations.

In March, brand architecture decisions began. The first round was rejected — it read too “tech startup.” The second round delivered an identity that carried the industrial heritage more openly while still being able to live in digital. The “Artı” mark in the logo was reduced to a single unit of measure carrying engineering precision. The color palette was built around a real blue-grey pulled from the factory equipment itself, with a warm copper accent for premium feel. Typography was consolidated into a single family (Inter Tight) — heading weight 600, body 400, complete language support.

April was the start of the digital assets. The website was modernized on WordPress (the CMS choice came from the marketing team’s manageability requirement). Architecture was rebuilt from scratch: product layer, sector application examples, case studies, export-focused landing pages. In the design iterations, the hardest call was the homepage hero — production floor photography, product rendering, or abstract graphic? After five rounds, the decision: product, in real production environment, photographed in warm light. Stock imagery was rejected.

May went to the attribution argument. The old Google Ads account wasn’t reset; historical data was preserved while migrating to GA4, HubSpot CRM was deployed, and a shared lead-stage taxonomy was written together with sales. The toughest debate was the definition of “qualified lead” — marketing said “anyone who fills the form,” sales said “if they don’t ask price, it’s empty.” Three weeks of meetings landed on a 6-question version of BANT adapted to industrial B2B. A HubSpot workflow automated that scoring.

June and July went to taking the performance media stack live. Google Ads campaigns were segmented into search + remarketing + display, Meta Ads was extended to LinkedIn with B2B targeting, and a Looker Studio dashboard was wired up to report to the board weekly. First week, nine leads arrived; 44% were qualified. For the first time, the marketing director could answer “where did each euro go, what did it return” with a number.

Three decisions across those six months proved load-bearing in hindsight. First, the WordPress call — a more modern headless CMS was proposed and rejected, because weekly content velocity for the marketing team mattered more than a developer-dependent stack. Second, the photography investment — once stock imagery was rejected, a three-day production shoot was planned at the Artı2000 factory with engineers in frame. That investment became a shared asset library across web, sales deck, catalogue, and LinkedIn. Third, the six-question structure of HubSpot scoring — short, but every question pulled directly from sales conversations: not abstract “need” but concrete fields like budget approval path, purchase timeline, engineering sign-off.

Act four — Launch and first 90 days

In early August, the new identity, new website, and new performance stack went live simultaneously. The launch was kept quiet — no sector press releases. Instead, personal emails to existing customers, sales-team training on the new deck, and a regular LinkedIn cadence of case studies.

The first 90 days told a clear story in data:

  • Organic traffic grew 62% — driven by page speed (LCP 1.4s), schema markup, and rewritten product pages.
  • Qualified quote requests rose 48% — the HubSpot scoring definition now matched sales’ definition of “the right lead.”
  • Media-buying CPA dropped 31% — long-tail keyword segmentation in search campaigns created separation from competitors.
  • Brand consistency score hit 92% — an independent reviewer measured visual + verbal consistency across web/social/sales deck/catalogue.
  • First-response to quote time fell 24% — HubSpot automation routed leads to a rep in 30 minutes, not 4 hours.
  • Sales-marketing shared taxonomy adoption reached 87% — the new taxonomy became shared language in the weekly meeting, not a point of debate.

When the marketing director presented Q1 to the board, the conversation moved from “we’re growing” to “247 qualified leads this quarter, 19% conversion, 38,000 EUR average deal size, attribution: 58% paid search, 22% organic, 11% LinkedIn, 9% referral.”

Act five — Twelve months later

The engagement ended. The relationship didn’t. beynart continues with Artı2000 on a monthly retainer for performance optimization and content production. The website lives in a quarterly review cycle, product pages get updated against new segments, and case studies are fed by the export team’s new wins.

Twelve months in, Artı2000 signed export contracts with two new countries — Romania and Jordan. In both cases, the first touch came through LinkedIn. Buyers had been reading the case study posts the sales team was sharing. A decade of trade-show-led customer acquisition had quietly turned into a hybrid model running alongside digital.

Three lessons from the project shaped beynart’s industrial B2B practice going forward. First, in industrial B2B, the right target isn’t to “look modern” — it’s to “look respected.” Second, a brand identity refresh stays incomplete without an attribution setup; visual consistency without measurable performance is a hollow refresh. Third, the shared taxonomy between sales and marketing decides the fate of every digital investment downstream; without shared language, even the most expensive media budget becomes the cheapest argument fuel.

The Artı2000 story became the reference case for beynart’s industrial B2B practice — the “brand + digital + performance, end to end” method learned across those six months has been applied to three similar engagements since.

03

The outcome

  • 01

    More consistent brand perception

  • 02

    Increased visibility and engagement across digital channels

  • 03

    Scalable media-buying infrastructure

process

From design to production — step by step

From strategy workshops to live operations, the same team runs every stage. Brand, product and engineering operate under one architecture.

How we work

STACK

Tech stack

  • Figma
  • Adobe Creative Suite
  • WordPress
  • Google Analytics 4
  • Google Ads
  • Meta Ads Manager
  • HubSpot
  • Looker Studio

from the case

The beynart team didn't just refresh our brand identity, they got our sales and marketing teams speaking the same language. Performance data met our targets in the first quarter.

Marketing Director

Marketing Director, Artı2000

Newsletter

MarTech, AI, and engineering systems — straight from the beynart team. Once every quarter, no spam.

Have a similar project in mind?

Let's find the layer that fits your need and map where the architecture begins.

contact

The right people, from the first message.

No gatekeepers, no brief relay. The team that talks strategy is the team that builds the system. Tell us where you want to grow — we bring the architecture.